Scheduled Monument

Hill of Barra, fortSM3997

Status: Designated

Documents

Where documents include maps, the use of this data is subject to terms and conditions (https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/termsandconditions).

The legal document available for download below constitutes the formal designation of the monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. The additional details provided on this page are provided for information purposes only and do not form part of the designation. Historic Environment Scotland accepts no liability for any loss or damages arising from reliance on any inaccuracies within this additional information.

Summary

Date Added
28/10/1977
Last Date Amended
05/03/2009
Type
Prehistoric domestic and defensive: fort (includes hill fort and promontory fort)
Local Authority
Aberdeenshire
Parish
Bourtie
NGR
NJ 80233 25694
Coordinates
380233, 825694

Description

The monument comprises the remains of a multi-vallate hillfort on the summit of the Hill of Barra, to the north of the River Don near its confluence with the River Urie. The monument is of likely Iron-Age date and shows evidence of multiple phases of construction and use. Both the interior and the surrounding hillside outside the fort are covered in later rig-and-furrow cultivation. Within the fort is Wallace's Putting Stone, a large glacial erratic with a mythical association with William Wallace. The monument was first scheduled in 1977 but an inadequate area was included to protect all of the archaeological remains; the present rescheduling rectifies this.

The monument comprises the well-preserved remains of an Iron-Age hillfort. Both the ramparts and ditches are clearly visible round the circuit, with a total of three circuits from two phases of construction. The outer two circuits represent the earlier phase, enclosing an area of around 165m E-W by around 130m transversely. These consist of two ramparts with external quarry ditches; on the north-west there is slight evidence for additional lines outside of this, although whether these were further complete circuits is uncertain. The defences survive best in the NE arc of the circuit, and are poorest in the west, where they have been denuded heavily and, in the case of the inner of the two earlier ramparts, removed entirely on the surface in places. Four entrances appear to have been present in this earlier sequence, one each in the north, east, south and west of the circuit. Of these, the E example is the best preserved, with the ramparts visibly returning around the ditch terminals; the N return of this entrance is revetted with boulders, a feature also visible on the N and S examples. The S entrance has been blocked by the later sequence of construction in the fort, and the W example has been blocked by a later stone wall seen on the 1st Edition Ordnance Survey (OS) mapping.

The third, innermost circuit is of the later construction phase, comprising a rampart and external ditch and with some evidence for a counterscarp to the east. This encloses a smaller area of around 120m E-W by around 95m transversely. This later rampart shows evidence of having been stone-faced, although the stones visible now appear to belong to the wall shown on the early OS map. In the inner rampart are two distinct entrances, one in the west and one in the east. Of these, the E example is the better preserved, with a distinct causeway crossing the ditch and large boulders flanking the break in the rampart. The W entrance is less well preserved, with the rampart being more poorly preserved and the later wall having blocked the entranceway. The causeway on the W side is still visible though, allowing the entrance to be identified easily.

The area to be scheduled is irregular on plan, to include the remains described and an area around them within which related material may be expected to be found, as shown in red on the accompanying map. The scheduling specifically excludes the above-ground elements of all fences and stiles, to allow for their maintenance.

Statement of National Importance

Cultural Significance

The monument's cultural significance can be expressed as follows:

Intrinsic characteristics

The monument is an excellent example of a multi-vallate fort, likely dating to the Iron Age. It retains its physical characteristics to a high degree, with almost the complete circuits of all three ramparts visible on the ground. The clear evidence at this site for multi-phase construction and occupation presents the opportunity to understand its two separate phases, the transition period between them and the reasons for this. The number of artefacts of various periods uncovered in and around the fort show that the potential for the survival of buried remains is very high. These include a variety of ceramic remains, dating mainly to the Iron Age, but there are also neolithic sherds, and a single sherd tentatively dated to the Bronze Age. A number of carved stones artefacts including a macehead, a bronze axe-head, several stone axes and numerous flint arrowheads balls have also been located in the area. It is clear from the finds that the site of the fort and the surrounding hill were in use long before the construction of the first phase of the fort, and that remains of these earlier uses have survived to some extent. The artefactual evidence is also important as very few forts in the area have been systematically excavated. Such buried deposits have the potential to inform our understanding of the construction, use and abandonment of this site and of similar sites of this class and period, and its relationship to the earlier remains found here.

Contextual characteristics

This monument belongs to a class found across the country, with the majority situated on the E coast, particularly in SE Scotland. This particular example bears a strong similarity to other examples of the type, including the nearby example at Barmekin of Echt, intervisible with the Hill of Barra site. Few examples of forts survive in the Strathdon area in any upstanding form, however, making the quality of survival of this example particularly noteworthy. It also dominates the landscape surrounding it, with extremely strong views in all directions, except the S-SE arc, where the view is slightly shorter. The fort's commanding location suggests that visibility and landscape control were important factors in its construction, as well as the obvious defensive value. The site therefore has the potential to enhance our understanding of the landscape position of such sites, the relationship with other contemporary sites and the reasons for these. As noted above, the fort is within direct view of the similar fort on Barmekin of Echt, as well as the rest of the Bennachie range. Bennachie itself is a crucial point in the landscape of the area in the later prehistoric and early medieval periods, evidenced by the wealth of remains found across the range, and especially on the Mither Tap.

Associative characteristics

The presence within of Wallace's Putting Stone, and the legends associated with it, shows that the site has continued to be known and valued in local consciousness.

National Importance

The monument is of national importance because it has an inherent potential to make a significant addition to the understanding of the past, in particular Iron-Age hillforts in the Strathdon region. This particular example is clearly a multi-phase site, allowing the opportunity to examine the relationship between the phases of the monument as well the phases themselves. The excellent survival of the monument above ground enhances the potential for valuable information to survive beneath the ground. Buried deposits from such sites have the potential to tell us about wider society at the time, how people lived, where they came from and who they had contact with. Its relationship with other similar sites nearby can tell us more about the socio-economic situation in the Strathdon region at the time of its construction, use and eventual abandonment. Its loss would impede our ability to understand the use of such monuments, their placing within the contemporary landscape both in Strathdon and across Scotland, and the building practices, social structure and economy of the time.

References

Bibliography

RCAHMS record the monument as NJ82NW 4, Barra Hill and Aberdeenshire SMR as NJ82NW0003, Barra Hillfort.

References:

RCAHMS 2007, IN THE SHADOW OF BENNACHIE: THE FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY OF DONSIDE, ABERDEENSHIRE, Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.

Feachem R W 1963, A GUIDE TO PREHISTORIC SCOTLAND, 1st Edition, London: Batsford.

Shepherd I A G 1986, EXPLORING SCOTLAND'S HERITAGE: GRAMPIAN, Edinburgh: Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland.

About Scheduled Monuments

Historic Environment Scotland is responsible for designating sites and places at the national level. These designations are Scheduled monuments, Listed buildings, Inventory of gardens and designed landscapes and Inventory of historic battlefields.

We make recommendations to the Scottish Government about historic marine protected areas, and the Scottish Ministers decide whether to designate.

Scheduling is the process that identifies, designates and provides statutory protection for monuments and archaeological sites of national importance as set out in the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979.

We schedule sites and monuments that are found to be of national importance using the selection guidance published in Designation Policy and Selection Guidance (2019)

Scheduled monument records provide an indication of the national importance of the scheduled monument which has been identified by the description and map. The description and map (see ‘legal documents’ above) showing the scheduled area is the designation of the monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. The statement of national importance and additional information provided are supplementary and provided for general information purposes only. Historic Environment Scotland accepts no liability for any loss or damages arising from reliance on any inaccuracies within the statement of national importance or additional information. These records are not definitive historical or archaeological accounts or a complete description of the monument(s).

The format of scheduled monument records has changed over time. Earlier records will usually be brief. Some information will not have been recorded and the map will not be to current standards. Even if what is described and what is mapped has changed, the monument is still scheduled.

Scheduled monument consent is required to carry out certain work, including repairs, to scheduled monuments. Applications for scheduled monument consent are made to us. We are happy to discuss your proposals with you before you apply and we do not charge for advice or consent. More information about consent and how to apply for it can be found on our website at www.historicenvironment.scot.

Find out more about scheduling and our other designations at www.historicenvironment.scot/advice-and-support. You can contact us on 0131 668 8914 or at designations@hes.scot.

Images

There are no images available for this record, you may want to check Canmore for images relating to Hill of Barra, fort

There are no images available for this record.

Search Canmore

Printed: 06/05/2024 15:15